Health ministry · Prevention and public health

Prevention: the policy that keeps people out of the waiting room

Germany spends more than half a trillion euros a year on health, and only a small fraction of it on keeping people healthy in the first place. The new minister has called prevention the best health policy. The instruments, and the gaps, are older than his tenure.

„Die beste Gesundheitspolitik lässt Krankheiten gar nicht erst entstehen.“

Carsten Linnemann · 23 September 2026 · government question time in the Bundestag · Federal Ministry of Health

A sentence and a programme

In English, the sentence says that the best health policy is one that stops illness from arising at all. Linnemann said it during the government question time on 23 September 2026, and on the same day he named prevention among his main themes in the Bundestag Health Committee, alongside digitalisation, patient steering, stable contribution rates and solidarity (hib 733/2026).

The sentence is a statement of direction rather than a programme. As of 8 October 2026 the ministry had announced no new prevention law, no new budget line and no national target. What exists is an inherited framework: the Prevention Act of 2015, screening programmes decided by the Federal Joint Committee, vaccination recommendations by the Standing Committee on Vaccination, and a federal public-health institute renamed in 2025. This page sets out that framework, the evidence base, and the questions a prevention-minded minister would have to answer.

Prevention also connects to Linnemann’s economic thinking. A workforce that stays healthy stays employed for longer — a link he has drawn throughout his work on work and performance and on demographic change. Critics of purely economic framings point out that prevention matters equally for people outside the labour market: children, older people and those with disabilities.

01 / Evidence

Why lifestyle-related conditions dominate

Most long-term illness in high-income countries is linked to a small number of modifiable risk factors.

According to the World Health Organization, non-communicable diseases — mainly cardiovascular conditions, cancers, chronic respiratory conditions and diabetes — accounted for about 75% of non-pandemic-related deaths worldwide in 2021. The WHO names tobacco use, physical inactivity, harmful use of alcohol, unhealthy diets and air pollution as the main risk factors, and stresses that effective responses require action beyond the health sector: in education, transport, finance and urban planning.

For Germany, this means that a large share of future demand for care is shaped by conditions that develop over decades and that can, in part, be delayed or avoided. It also means that much of prevention is not health-ministry business at all. Tobacco and alcohol taxation are set by the finance ministry; food labelling and advertising rules by the agriculture and food ministry; school sport and school meals by the Länder; workplace safety by employers and the statutory accident insurers.

Health literacy — the ability to find, understand, assess and apply health information — is the bridge between information and behaviour. The second German Health Literacy Survey (HLS-GER 2), published with support of the Federal Ministry of Health, found that 58.8% of the population had limited health literacy in 2020/21. Assessing information was hardest: 71.5% of respondents found it difficult. People with lower education, lower income, migration experience, older age or long-term illness were more often affected.

These figures matter for policy design. Campaigns that rely on reading and self-motivation tend to reach people who are already well-informed; approaches that work through settings — nurseries, schools, workplaces, neighbourhoods — reach a broader population. That is the logic of the German Prevention Act.

Evidence noteThe WHO figure is global. National cause-of-death statistics are published by Destatis; they are not reproduced here to keep this page focused on prevention policy rather than illness.

02 / Framework

Five layers of prevention in Germany

From national strategy to the individual vaccination. Each layer has a different owner — which is both a strength and the main coordination problem.

  1. National strategy — Prevention Act 2015

    The Präventionsgesetz came into force on 25 July 2015. It created the National Prevention Conference (NPK), carried by the statutory health, long-term care, accident and pension insurers, which adopted federal framework recommendations in February 2016. It also obliges health insurers to spend minimum amounts per insured person on prevention. In force · inherited

  2. Settings — nurseries, schools, municipalities, care homes

    Insurers fund projects in “living environments” (Lebenswelten). Long-term care insurers spent €25 million on prevention in care homes in 2024, 25% more than in 2023 (Prevention Report 2025). In implementation

  3. Workplaces — occupational health promotion

    Health insurers spent €282 million on workplace health promotion in 2024 (+5%), reaching 28,142 workplaces and about 2.06 million employees — both slightly fewer than in 2023. In implementation

  4. Early detection — screening and check-ups

    The Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), the self-governing body of doctors, hospitals and insurers, decides which screening examinations statutory insurance covers, including organised programmes and the general health check-up. Self-administration

  5. Vaccination — STIKO recommendations

    The independent Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch Institute recommends vaccinations; the G-BA turns recommendations into insurance benefits; the Länder issue public recommendations. Measles vaccination is mandatory for children in community facilities since 2020. In force

€686mHealth-insurer spending on prevention and health promotion in settings, workplaces and individual courses — above the 2019 level of €630.8m2024 · GKV/MD Prevention Report 2025
€3.79Minimum spending per insured person on workplace health promotion (individual courses €2.28; settings €2.58)2025 · statutory guide values, per Prevention Report
58.8%Share of the population with limited health literacy2020/21 · HLS-GER 2, Bielefeld University / BMG
03 / Vaccination

High coverage, late completion

Robert Koch Institute data show that most children are eventually vaccinated, but often later than recommended.

Second measles vaccination, share of children

Unit: % · Germany · 2019 vs 2023 · RKI vaccination monitoring

  • Age 24 months, 201970%
  • Age 24 months, 202377%
  • Age 6 years, 201989%
  • Age 6 years, 202392%
  • Target95%

SourceRobert Koch Institute, as reported by Deutsches Ärzteblatt (11 Dec 2025) and press reports on the RKI vaccination monitoring. The 95% figure is the RKI coverage target.

The Measles Protection Act, in force since 2020, requires proof of measles vaccination for children in nurseries and schools. Since then, the share of children with two doses at 24 months rose from 70% (2019) to 77% (2023), and at age six from 89% to 92%, according to RKI data. More than one child in five still lacked the second dose at their second birthday.

Other gaps are larger. In 2024, 55% of girls and 36% of boys aged 15 were fully vaccinated against HPV. Uptake of recommended vaccinations among adults — for example against influenza and COVID-19 — is well below 50%, the RKI reported in December 2025. One recent success: the RSV immunisation recommended for infants roughly halved the number of babies needing hospital care for RSV in the 2024/25 winter season.

Recent laws widen access. The pharmacy reform of 2026 allows pharmacies to give all non-live vaccines, and trained pharmacy staff to vaccinate (In force · inherited). The GeDIG bill, debated in the Bundestag on 8 October 2026, would add a digital vaccination overview with reminder function to the electronic patient record (Inherited · in parliament).

At the same time, the GKV contribution-stabilisation law of July 2026 raised the discount on patented vaccines to 9% and imposes a price moratorium on vaccines from 2027 to 2030 (In force · inherited). Manufacturers argue this weakens incentives; insurers argue prices had risen too fast. See pharmaceutical policy.

04 / Fields of action

Where prevention happens

Open each field for the institutions involved, the status of policy and the open questions.

Children’s health

Statutory insurance covers a series of check-ups for children (the “U” examinations from birth to school age, plus a youth examination), which track development and offer vaccination advice. The Länder carry out school-entry examinations through local public health offices. Many children’s health questions — physical activity, nutrition in nurseries and schools, mental well-being — fall under Länder and municipal responsibility, or under the family and education ministries.

Inherited The federal ministry’s current line is unchanged. Linnemann has made no specific statement on children’s prevention since taking office. As an MP he caused controversy in 2019 with a proposal on language tests before school entry — an education rather than health topic, documented on the criticism page.

Early detection and screening

The G-BA decides which screening examinations are covered, for which age groups and at what intervals, on the basis of benefit assessments by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Organised programmes invite eligible people by letter. The general health check-up for adults also includes counselling on risk factors.

Self-administration The minister does not decide screening content directly; he supervises the legality of G-BA decisions. Whether the primary-care reform announced for November 2026 will assign GPs a stronger role in organising prevention is an open question.

Workplace health

Employers are responsible for occupational safety; the statutory accident insurers for prevention of work-related accidents and illness; health insurers for voluntary workplace health promotion under the Prevention Act. Smaller firms are harder to reach — a recurring finding of the prevention reports.

Inherited No new initiative announced. The link to Linnemann’s labour-market agenda — longer, healthier working lives, the “Aktivrente” for people working past retirement age — is clear in principle but has not been turned into a health-ministry measure.

Health literacy and public information

The Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) was renamed the Federal Institute for Public Health (BIÖG) by ministerial decree on 13 February 2025, with a broader public-health mandate and a cooperation agreement with the Robert Koch Institute. Its seat is in Cologne. The institute runs national information campaigns and gathers data on health behaviour.

Inherited The renaming was done by decree under Karl Lauterbach; a statutory basis for a larger public-health institute was not passed before the 2025 election. Its future structure is not settled.

Pharmacies and primary care as prevention points

The pharmacy reform adopted in 2026 adds preventive services to pharmacies, including counselling on stopping smoking, rapid tests and vaccinations. At the German Pharmacists’ Day in September 2026 Linnemann called for a stronger role for pharmacies in guiding patients.

In force · inherited for the pharmacy reform; Announced for the primary-care system that may link prevention to patient steering.

05 / Tests ahead

Four tests for a prevention minister

Questions raised by the evidence and by the minister’s own emphasis. None has yet been answered by a concrete proposal.

Money under pressure

The 2027 health budget falls from €21.77 billion to €14.33 billion in the draft, and the contribution-stabilisation law caps spending growth. Prevention budgets are easy to cut because their returns are slow and diffuse. Will prevention be protected?

Beyond the health ministry

The strongest levers — taxes on tobacco, alcohol or sugar, advertising rules, school meals, urban design — sit with other ministries and the Länder. A “health in all policies” approach needs cabinet-level coordination.

Reaching those with least access

Health literacy is lowest among people with lower education and income. Prevention that relies on individual motivation can widen inequalities rather than narrow them.

Measuring success

Germany has no binding national prevention targets. Without measurable goals, a political commitment to prevention is hard to hold to account.